[Christine Lagana Riordan]

Hi Radha. Really important questions. Keeping your audience in mind, I would not run sponsored content without disclosing in any circumstance I can think of but if you have one in mind, I’m happy to give feedback. Associations are often criticized for representing big business and that jeopardizes not only trust from your audiences, but also potentially your 501c3 status. In my magazine days, we labeled all sponsored content as advertorial and gave it a different look (a stripe down the side of the page, a frame around the content). You need to have a policy in place so a funder can read it before creating copy for your channels. You can also use it to push back on requests and hold to your ethical standards. I’m sure you can find stats (ChatGPT?)about the erosion of trust based on consumers believing your brand is trying to “get one over on them.” Consumers are more savvy than some marketers give them credit for. Good luck. 

[Christine Lagana Riordan]

Thank you to everyone who expressed interest in this initiative to connect with academic institutions! I will partner with Sindy to determine next steps and keep the group informed! If you are interested in participating, but have not replied to this thread, please feel free to email me at [email protected]!

[Christine Lagana Riordan]

I just received an e-mail from Taproot about an upcoming webinar about pro bono legal resources:https://taprootfoundation.org/events/trustlaw-an-introduction-to-legal-pro-bono-2/

[Christine Lagana Riordan]

All HRA members with an active user account on the HRA website are subscribed to all forums for which they have viewing privileges. This means:

• Everyone who has an active user account on the HRA website will receive email notifications from the Info, Jobs, and RFA/RFP Forums
• HRA members who are designated as the CEO for their organization can access and will receive email notifications from the CEO Forum (including Executive Directors, etc.)

You can unsubscribe from email notifications at any time by clicking the ‘Unsubscribe’ link within the footer of a Forum email notification.

Thanks!

Jenna

[Christine Lagana Riordan]

CureSHANK allows up to 10% of the total costs to be applied to indirect costs. 

so:

Direct costs / 0.90 = Total costs

Geraldine

Geraldine Bliss

http://www.CureSHANK.org

713-208-0673

[Christine Lagana Riordan]

Hi Kavita,

In response to your first question, we utilize the NIH scoring range of 1 to 9 as the overall impact score, with our funding cutoff set between 1.0 and 2.99 (high impact). Applications that receive scores in the range of 3.0 to 3.2  may be funded and considered for a process we refer to as “rapid revise and resubmit.” This provides applicants with the opportunity to address critiques raised by our scientific review committee that can be effectively resolved within the timeframe prior to presenting our funding recommendations to the board for official approval.

Our decision on these scoring cutoffs was informed by a thorough analysis of data from recent years, including initial and final scores from reviewers, the variability between these scores, and the typical score of applications we typically choose to fund. It is important to note that while scoring plays a significant role in our evaluation process, we also take into account additional factors such as the career stage of the investigator, the relevance of the research topic,  our budget, etc. This approach is very helpful when we are faced with a highly competitive pool of proposals that demonstrate strong scores, and there are budget constraints.

Vanessa Gonzalez

Director of Grant Programs

 2510 North Frontage Road, Darien, IL 60561
Direct: 630-737-9724 | P: 630-737-9700 | foundation.aasm.org

 

[Author]

Posts